<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gradient &#187; 1990 target</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegradient.info/tag/1990-target/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegradient.info</link>
	<description>the space between black and white</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>2020 Targets in Context</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2009/11/2020-targets-in-context-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2009/11/2020-targets-in-context-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990 target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab32]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2009/11/2020-targets-in-context-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nearly universal agreement that GHG emissions must come down quickly to constrain future temperature increases to the 2 degree C mark. As we go into Copenhagen, with two US bills on the table, the Senate hopefully to pass soon, I thought it might be worth showing some of the targets associated with other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nearly universal agreement that GHG emissions must come down quickly to constrain future temperature increases to the 2 degree C mark. As we go into Copenhagen, with two US bills on the table, the Senate hopefully to pass soon, I thought it might be worth showing some of the targets associated with other countries and how the US bills compare.</p>
<p>So in this figure, the blue columns reflects a few of the current commitments by nations, including <a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/norway-pledges-40-perecent-emissions-cuts/" target="_blank">Norway’s recently announced commitment</a> to reduce their emissions by 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels. Indonesia has also committed to reduce their emissions by 26 percent below 1990, and they are confident that they “<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSSP495601" target="_blank">could cut emissions by as much as 41 percent</a>” below 1990 if international aid is available. The UK has <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-03-09-eu_N.htm" target="_blank">pledged a 20 percent commitment</a> (30 percent if there is an international agreement). Russia and Japan have both committed to 25% below 1990.<a href="http://thegradient.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2020Targets6.png"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; display: inline; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" title="2020 Targets" src="http://thegradient.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2020Targets_thumb2.png" border="0" alt="2020 Targets" width="416" height="294" align="right" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://thegradient.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2020Targets7.png"></a></p>
<p>The green column reflects the IPCC recommendation for how much wealthy nations must reduce their emissions by 2020 to maintain the 2 degree C limit in global temperature rise.</p>
<p>And finally, we have CA and the US. California has a <a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/docs/ab32text.pdf" target="_blank">state law</a> committing to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (yes, that’s zero below 1990, which at the time was very forward looking). And the US currently has two bills in play (<a href="http://www.wri.org/stories/2009/10/wri-summary-clean-energy-jobs-and-american-power-act-kerry-boxer" target="_blank">WRI has nice summaries of both bills</a>), but neither really does much more than nudge us below 1990 levels.<script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2009/11/2020-targets-in-context-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
