It’s interesting to contrast the way in which UC Berkeley (and the UC system) has handled Chancellor Birgeneau’s student protests (see a summary here) and the way in which the system (and then-President Dynes) handled similar incidents against then Chancellor Denton (see a summary here).
Categories
Archives
Most recent comments
- dniemeier on The NYT’s Public Editor
- Jack Prais on The NYT’s Public Editor
- Deb Niemeier’s principled view on the UC Davis troubles « Urban ethics and theory on Universities should be bigger than their chancellor
- Tim Morton on Universities should be bigger than their chancellor
- Lolita1985 on “We stopped a war”
One Comment
UCB Chancellor Birgeneau Loss of Credibility, Trust
The UCB budget gap has grown to $150 million, and still the Chancellor is spending money that isn’t there on expensive outside consultants. His reasons range from the need for impartiality to requiring the “innovative thinking, expertise, and new knowledge” the consultants would bring.
Does this mean that the faculty and management of a world-class research and teaching institution lack the knowledge, impartiality, innovation, and professionalism to come up with solutions? Have they been fudging their research for years? The consultants will glean their recommendations from interviewing faculty and the UCB management that hired them; yet solutions could be found internally if the Chancellor were doing the job HE was hired to do. Consultant fees would be far better spent on meeting the needs of students.
There can be only one conclusion as to why creative solutions have not been forthcoming from the professionals within UCB: Chancellor Birgeneau has lost credibility and the trust of the faculty as well as of the Academic Senate leadership that represents them. Even if the faculty agrees with the consultants’ recommendations – disagreeing might put their jobs in jeopardy – the underlying problem of lost credibility and trust will remain.